The Politicization of European Integration: National Parliaments and the Democratic Disconnect
نویسنده
چکیده
Discussion of the democratic strengths or, more usually, weaknesses of the EU tends to focus on the degree of democracy that is available or possible at the EU level. Such thinking reflects a certain neo-functionalist logic that has governed much scholarly writing about the relationship between EU integration and democracy. It assumes that enhanced competences for EU institutions potentially create a democratic deficit at the European level that can only be filled by enhancing to an equal degree the democratic features of those same bodies, most especially by increasing the powers of the European Parliament (EP) (Rittberger 2005; 2014). The articles in this special issue take a different tack that challenges that assumption. They focus on what has been called the democratic disconnect between the domestic democratic institutions of the member states and the EU (Lindseth 2010: 234), rather than a democratic deficit in the operation of EU institutions. Consequently, the contributors look at how EU policy-making might be authorized by, and rendered more responsive and accountable to, the citizens of the member states through EU affairs and policy-making figuring more prominently in their domestic democratic processes, with National Parliaments (NPs) playing a key role as mechanisms of democratic reconnection.
منابع مشابه
Parliaments and European Security Policy: Mapping the Parliamentary Field
The more important governmental cooperation and bureaucratic involvement become in ESDP, the more pressing becomes the issue of democratic control of executive cooperation. This article starts from the argument that parliamentary involvement in decisionmaking is of central importance for ensuring the democratic quality of European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). It uses the notion of a mult...
متن کاملDelegation of Powers and the Fiduciary Principle
No more serious pitfall threatens the student of the European Union than the idea of assessing the EU’s institutions and decision processes using the same criteria that are relevant at the national level. For example, in spite of several superficial analogies, one cannot understand the European Parliament using the same conceptual categories which have proved useful in analyzing national parlia...
متن کاملComplementing, competing, or co-operating? Exploring newspapers’ portrayals of the European Parliament and national parliaments in EU affairs
The paper explores newspapers' portrayals of the European Parliament and national parliaments (NPs) in European Union (EU) affairs. To understand underlying perceptions of journalists, it takes public parliamentary activities and looks at their influence on parliaments' news visibility in Finland, Germany and the UK in routine periods in 2011 and 2012. This is done against the background that p...
متن کاملHistorical Overview: The Parliamentary Library from Past to Present
In 2002 Quebec's National Assembly hosted an international conference on the history of parliamentary libraries. On that occasion, Gaston Bernier called for more research on the history of parliamentary libraries , inviting researchers to make use of the rich and unexplored archives of parliamentary libraries throughout the world (2003). This historical overview features some of the most promin...
متن کاملCould a “yellow Card” for National Parliaments Strengthen Judicial as Well as Political Policing of Subsidiarity?
It is argued that subsidiarity should be interpreted, in accordance with the principle of effectiveness, as requiring that the Community should only act where the objectives of the proposed action can only be achieved at Community level. Subsidiarity has not so far been an effective brake on action by the European institutions, and the Court’s scrutiny of Community acts for compliance with subs...
متن کامل